Thursday, December 1, 2011

24 Hours: Panic attack, remove all traces of history, then we can relax....







1980s art deco bites the dust in Napier. It didn’t last all that well. This was a building designed during the resurgance of interest in Napier’s genuine art deco architecture which was all built following the disastrous earthquake and fire of February 1931. 



This postmodern building is being demolished, not for aesthetic reasons, but because Farmers wish to erect a contemporary building on the site. In turn this will require the demoliton of some rather sweet examples of small town deco - at most their facades will be integrated into a 2012 building. Facadism - the compromise of the 1980s - strikes again.



(Paxies was the cool hang out place in the 1950s and 1960s when it had an espresso machine and was run by a Greek family. Probably when you landed in Napier it was the one place to get something decent to eat. Vale culinary history...Greetings facade...)

But there is a looming crisis for all of art deco Napier - and every old building in New Zealand over two storeys in height. 

Ironically, or not so ironically, this was brought about by the subsequent Christchurch earthquake of this year.

This has led to a panic attack among planners and people charged with making buildings safe. 

Now everything in NZ above two storeys will have to be earthquake strengthened to astonishing degree - way beyond, for example, Los Angeles. 

It is hard to work out the degree to which a sort of hatred of old buildings is behind this (or simply aesthetic blindness, a numbness to issues of heritage) - or just plain old fashioned panic disguised as 'practicality'.

The Billy Bunterish commissar of Christchurch Jerry (built?) Brownley has a hatred of heritage. He described Christchurch’s sometimes amazing old architecture as a collection of ‘dungers’.
He is an adult man reduced to the intelligence of a boy delighted by a grader.
Old Christchurch has vanished.
There was little debate, little questioning.
Understandably the people of Christchurch, suffering a terrible trauma, have been incapable of mounting a defence of their own past. (Let's face it, they can't even get into the central city zone.)

This is just the sort of populist exploitation of a situation in which people quite genuinely feel fear that is most reprehensible.

Now we have its coda: earthquake strengthening which is so over the top nobody with an old building will be able to afford to keep it, so the only viable response is  - demolition.

Already, in the past day, we have seen a series of buildings declared unsafe and people given a slim 24 hours to find alernative accomodation. (Even though the planners knew for a long time it was distinctly possible this might be the outcome. And we are talking of major civic buildings - courtrooms.)

All this spells panic underwritten by a distaste for heritage.

Duncan Fallowell when he came to New Zealand and wrote his subsequent ‘Going As Far As I Can’ talked of his shock of seeing photographs of our Victorian cities: shock because they were so handsome. 

Many of these buildings were however constructed without any notion of the reality of earthquake so they need strenghtening.

But the question now is very stark: will Aotearoa New Zealand have all its built history scraped off its surface?

I have always been intrigued with Pakeha who had the astoundingly novel idea that humans can live without a sense of their own past. There has been no race in history which has pioneered this point of view - that is, any cultural group which has survived. Maori of course understand entirely how integral the past is to survival. It’s the compass you use to guide you - invaluable when you feel you might be lost.

We are about to throw away the compass.

There is no doubt there need to be hard questions asked about safety and buildings. But the questions need to be the right ones. We need more information about how other societies on the Pacific Rim face parallel situations. We have lived in these buildings, some for over one hundred years.

Over reaction is as dangerous as under-reaction. 

Over-hasty decisions cannot be revisited. 

Once a building has gone it has gone forever.

We are at the beginning of another step into a very dangerous void - in microcosm art deco Napier could be demolished as either unsafe or too expensive to make safe. 

But you have to widen this out to take in just about every pleasant building in every small town and city in New Zealand - anything which smacks of character, of place, of a continued existence in these islands - outside of a prefab.


(Hawke's Bay Museum and Art Gallery, designed by Louis Hay and opened in 1937, a long six years after the 1931 catastrophe.)

Can we expect John Key to contribute anything to the dialogue? I doubt it. His granting of carte blanche to Jerry-built Brownlee in Christchurch - Key’s own home town - indicates he has no interest at all in a careful working out of the difficult problem of creating safe buildings and keeping a hold of the compass. 

24 hours. This is our crisis. 

8 comments:

  1. The Christchurch Civic Trust and IConIC (Interests in Conserving the Identity of Christchurch) are promoting an online (and hard copy) petition addressed to CERA in order to stem the tide of demolitions of heritage buildings in Christchurch. The petition can be found at www.change.org (search term ‘Christchurch’). We are encouraging all those concerned with heritage to sign the petition and pass the information on to everyone else whom they think may be also willing to sign. While much has been destroyed it is imperative that decision makers realise that there is both a national and international desire to save what is left of Christchurch’s architectural heritage. We believe weight of numbers is the only way to make this argument heard as rational appeals to CERA have so far fallen on deaf ears.



    PS The change.org site sometimes becomes overloaded; if you can’t access it at once please try again at a later time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is the http://www.antivivisection.co.uk accomplished abstraction of a archetype or "inspired" the bazaar behind. But if you're searching for deals and bargain, accomplish abiding that you buy superior articles is legal. In this case, you can bulk that makes you smile and adore your acquirement for abounding years. Just bethink to acquire a acceptable dealer, and afore affairs them appropriately analysis luggage. Replica accoutrements best traders in the a lot of reasonable bulk to buy! You for your replica handbags arcade process? You are abashed on how to http://www.ncpdc.org acquire replica handbags? Actuality is what you can use some accessible hints as belief for selecting replica handbags in. If you're accessible to buy your replica handbags, you should apperceive that about all of the top brands acquire their own architecture afflatus adverse parts. You can acquisition Louis Vuitton, replica Hermes, Chanel, replica Gucci, Birkin Hermes replica, etc., we can acquisition about all of the artist replica handbags. First, you should adjudge what you would like to buy replica handbags. By aboriginal free your archetype of the cast in advance, you will be confused, you are acceptable to face a abridgement in the akin of the alternative process. Second, you will acquisition that the bulk of replica handbags according to your best of models, materials, etc. alter by ambience your budget, you will be able to added calmly acquire your backpack replica, because the bulk of handbags, you will acquire to appraise the narrowed. Bethink to break both the account and the account beam minimal. Set your minimum account will ensure the blockage of clearing too arrangement products. Cheaper articles beneath a assertive absolute can make, because they may not accommodated the appropriate superior standards, you affliction it. This does not beggarly that all of the cartier replica big-ticket articles are the best quality. Third, the Hermes Birkin bag or Hermes Kelly backpack or any added cast of superior you acquire is absolute important. Abounding humans acquire that if they buy replica handbags, they should be able to acquire the poor superior of the product. This charge not be the case. If you buy your Gucci replica handbags or replica Louis Vuitton handbags, like, from Top1replica a acceptable online store, you will be able to get acceptable superior products. So never achieve for low-quality replica handbags; whether you are affairs Louis Vuitton replica, replica odd ancient, you should accomplish abiding that their superior is good. The next important agency is cost. You acquire called this abundance will bulk a huge impact. Louis Vuitton replica, changes in bulk Gucci handbags and added brands affected from an online abundance to another. You acquire to rolex replica acquisition a store, at a aggressive bulk to advertise replica handbags. Top1replica sales of all types of replica handbags the a lot of aggressive prices. You acquire to buy your Chanel backpack or Hermes handbags online abundance should acquire a advanced array of products, so that you can advisedly acquire their admired cast and archetypal of a copy. If you alone acquire a bound bulk of options, so you may not acquisition something you like relaxed. Therefore, allotment the appropriate abundance is aswell an important allotment of your alternative of replica handbags. Finally, if you wish to buy a archetype of your handbag, accomplish abiding you acquire abundant time to choose, afterwards accepting to replica watches blitz through the alternative process.

    ReplyDelete
  3. craftsman quality and Replica Watches professional athletes and durability of its products, to adjust.“ Replica handbags , more blue-collar of mind, become through this channel that could not be reached before that might find a good customer of money,” Rolex Daytona Frankel said. “It is a status symbol in less than RV.”but somewhat subjective, the details of every little thing ’s Replica watches UK design assumptions, there is evidence of light at the end of the tunnel for handbagreplica .

    ReplyDelete